The hottest topics in the market over the past week seem to be related to Ethereum. One is that Vitalik Buterin shared the current dilemmas, challenges, and some solutions for Ethereum during a community AMA, sparking considerable discussion; the other is the sudden theft of over 500,000 Ethereum from Bybit over the weekend. These two events have had completely different impacts, yet both have made Ethereum the center of attention.
In the past couple of years, the industry’s evaluation of Ethereum has often been a rather sarcastic remark: “If you bought Ethereum, you must have paid off your debts from your previous life,” mocking the price of Ethereum. After all, the current state of the industry is that the price itself greatly reflects its development, as seen with Solana next door.
So, looking back at reality, what challenges is Ethereum actually facing that have shaken both its overall market value and community reputation?
Through discussions with several core community members who have long followed Ethereum, they provided quite a few seemingly reasonable insights, including that the Ethereum Foundation has been in a state of “nominal existence,” often inactive except for selling ETH; or that the explosion of Layer 2 has weakened Ethereum’s intrinsic value; and that the new narratives popular in the market have not really emerged from Ethereum.
These descriptions of the problems seem to hit the nail on the head, but I believe this may only be the surface presentation, and the underlying issues lie elsewhere.
Regarding the study of why large companies fail, there is a bestselling book titled “The Innovator’s Dilemma,” which is also regarded as one of the 20 most influential business books of the 20th century. The conclusion of the book is that excellent large companies fail because small companies engage in disruptive innovation, thereby encroaching on the market of large companies, while the innovations made by large companies are mostly “sustaining innovations,” which cannot prevent small companies from “disrupting” the market of large companies.
The real challenge facing Ethereum at present is precisely this.

Looking back at the birth of the Ethereum mainnet, it has been nearly 10 years. Ten years is not considered young for a company, especially in the rapidly developing Web3 industry.
Although in a recent interview, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin did not acknowledge that Ethereum is a company, stating, “I think Ethereum is a decentralized ecosystem, not a company. If Ethereum becomes a company, we will lose most of the meaning of Ethereum’s existence.”
However, if Ethereum’s development over the past 10 years is not the result of corporate development, it might have taken on a different form. After all, in the blockchain field, the only project that has truly achieved “de-corporatization” is Bitcoin, and there are no others.
Therefore, the challenges Ethereum currently faces are actually similar issues that all large enterprises encounter: overall innovation is hindered, and the management (Ethereum Foundation) is “resting on its laurels,” leading to inefficiency.
Thus, in the interview, Vitalik mentioned that the core way for Ethereum to emerge from its current predicament is to need a new narrative, and this new narrative is essentially innovation. He also talked about “the Ethereum Foundation has started many internal reforms in recent months,” which specifically address organizational efficiency issues.
Although Vitalik denies that Ethereum is a company, when organizational problems are exposed, it can only be reformed using corporate management methods.
As a result, another challenge regarding the future development of Ethereum has emerged: Is Vitalik ready to become a manager?
Despite being the first to speak out in the face of numerous challenges, what lies ahead for him is the issue of transforming a large enterprise. After years of wild growth, Vitalik also needs to transition from a technical expert to a “non-entrepreneurial entrepreneur,” and even rethink or balance “decentralization.” So, is he ready?
After reading the entire interview, I am curious whether Vitalik will face a significant psychological struggle in this transformation, as it requires reshaping not only Ethereum itself but also this soul figure. Or perhaps, changing his profile picture over a month ago has already signaled his determination. I don’t know, and I don’t understand, after all, the “Dragon Slayer Boy” is no longer young, and after experiencing the collision of the world, there will always be some changes.
Finally, if readers want to ask me whether Ethereum can overcome its challenges and my views on its future development, perhaps a down-to-earth summary would be: ETH still has a market value of 330 billion dollars and remains the second-largest crypto project.